I support either option and would ask any admin who comes across this to please look into this situation ASAP. It is time to either protect this page or block the editor in question. The obsessive quality to 62.85.192.81's removal of these facts calls into question their motive in any edits on this subject. As has been pointed out a consensus has been reached on the subject by several editors. Viva-Verdi has even taken the extraordinary step of not naming the Figaro System in the article. It is a fact that they use the Figaro System. All of this is notable in an article on wikipedia. It is also a fact that they use an electronic libretto system. The Ellie Caulkins Opera House exists as a fact. :: Viva-Verdi 20:30, (UTC) Reply This anonymous editor cannot provide any evidence for their baseless accusations against Viva-Verdi. ::He/she was BLOCKED SEVERAL TIMES (look at the page) for this and other vandalism. ::Once again this clown, User talk:62.85.192.81, continues to revert text WHICH IS MORE OR LESS THE SAME AS ON THE Electronic libretto article where a clear consensus was established that it was valuable. NOW 62.85.192.81 (Talk) repeats his/her deletions here with no justification beyond a posting on his/her talk page assuming that I'm 'self promoting' Figaro Systems, the company which produces this system BUT WHICH IS NOT EVEN NAMED IN THE ARTICLE.Īgain, I'm asking for consensus that this text (which I DID NOT write) be retained. User talk:62.85.192.81 (Talk) has been blocked for doing this on several occasions. In the article Electronic libretto one anonymous editor has persistantly removed text even though several other editors have supported the return of the text and a consensus has been reached. It is time to stop this arrogant user to continue with its SELF PROMOTION NOT ALLOWED !!! Viva-verdi is using wikipedia to self promote Simultex, A FIGARO SYSTEMS TRADEMARK PRODUCT using wikipedia.

Ellie caulkins opera house best seats